38
Jurisdictions deployed
14.2M
Exhibits sealed
100%
Admissibility record
from €22k
Monthly, ICC-scale
What we replace
Legacy e-discovery tools run on clouds your jurisdiction doesn't control. A political shift in Washington should not end a war-crimes investigation in The Hague.
◆
Self-host on any infrastructure. Zero telemetry, zero outbound calls, air-gap compatible. No vendor lock-in.
◇
Every custody event is hash-chained. PostgreSQL RLS refuses UPDATEs and DELETEs — even from superusers.
□
AES-256-GCM encryption of witness PII. Defence sees pseudonyms. Duress passphrases produce decoy vaults.
○
AGPL-3.0. Read the code, audit the crypto, fork if you have to. Evidence survives the company.
How it works
Four phases, each cryptographically bound to the next.
Built for
ICC, ad-hoc tribunals, hybrid courts. Complex multi-jurisdictional cases with strict admissibility requirements.
Bellingcat, Mnemonic, Forensic Architecture, Airwars. Documenting violations, preserving digital evidence under hostile conditions.
Defence and prosecution handling sensitive material where chain of custody is legally critical. First-class defence counsel support.
Transitional justice bodies managing testimony archives, victim statements, and historical documentation across decades.
The shift
Legacy · Proprietary · Cloud-locked
Azure-tied hosting. One sanctions action and you're locked out.
Admin-modifiable audit logs that defence counsel challenge.
File-export "federation" — no cryptographic guarantees.
Cloud AI. Witness statements through whoever owns the GPU.
Proprietary. You cannot audit the custody engine.
~€2.5M / 5yr at ICC scale, plus professional services.
“
A defence lawyer used to win cases by raising doubt about who held the drive overnight. With VaultKeeper that conversation is over before it begins.
Juge Hélène Morel
Presiding judge, Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris — Cybercrime chamber
A typical NGO is live in 15 minutes on their own Hetzner box. A full tribunal migration takes six weeks.